Most companies that send employees overseas for an extended period
of time understand the need for preparation and cross-cultural
education. But many expatriates still return home prematurely or
remain overseas for the duration of the assignment but work well
below their full potential. Here are a few ways companies can
unwittingly contribute to their expatriates' downfall.
Fail to give an employee sufficient time to decide
Too often, companies ask someone to make a quick decision about an
expatriate assignment. If this is a new proposition for the
employee, it is critical that she have enough time to realistically
weigh both the professional and personal pros and cons - after the
initial excitement about the opportunity has had a chance to settle
down. Allowing time for expat candidates to grasp the assignment's
upcoming challenges will increase their opportunity to fully
consider whether or not this is the right decision. Preventing the
deployment of someone who realizes an assignment is not for them
before they begin training saves a company far more that the
average $2 million they invest in each expatriate's salary and
expenses.
Tell an employee to "Google it"
It should go without saying, but leaving an employee to
independently learn about a new culture leads only to failure. Nor
should corporations give just enough information to further confuse
them. It's crucial to provide expatriate candidates with detailed
information on how to navigate the complexities of living and
working in their assignment country.
Rely on an online cultural profile tool
A number of online tools exist that, unfortunately, have the
potential to provide irrelevant and counterproductive information.
These tools create a profile of the user's supposed cultural
adaptability, and then provide Wikipedia-like information about a
particular country. The assessment tool can be flawed or invalid,
however. What an expat learns about a culture must be in the
context of their specific circumstances.
For example, an expatriate employee was sent to Belgium to run his
company's newly acquired company. He filled out an online profile
that clearly showed that his home culture (the United States) was
far more risk-taking than the Belgian culture. Fair enough, but in
fact the organization he was going to lead in Belgium was extremely
entrepreneurial and risk-taking, so much so that he felt the newly
acquired company was taking greater risks than the parent company
would allow.
Discount the business significance of a family's
happiness
One of the largest reasons for failed expat assignments is
dissatisfaction among the employee's family. It is important that
the entire family, not just the expat, receive sufficient support
and have an opportunity to consider whether they want to embark
upon this adventure. In many cases, taking an international
assignment requires the accompanying partner to leave a job and
possibly change careers. The loss of income and satisfaction from a
job can potentially undermine the self-esteem of the accompanying
partner.
Neglect to continue the dialogue throughout the duration of
the assignment
Throughout an expat's assignment, it is critical that he receive
professional coaching to focus on the local and corporate
organizational needs.
Fail to capture and leverage the knowledge gained from your
expats' experiences
Too often the knowledge each expat gains from an assignment leaves
the company when the employee does. The savviest global companies
understand the power of utilizing a robust knowledge management
system to learn from past mistakes and successes and make the
training for each expat specific to their company.
Provide mediocre cross-cultural training
Even companies investing in cross-cultural training may unwittingly
contribute to potential failure of the assignee, simply because
some training programs aren't much better than doing one's own
online research. Mediocre training gives the expat generic
information and creates a false sense of security, leaving them
unprepared for what they face when they touch down in a new
country. Here are examples of some of the worst cross-cultural
training offenses:
- Providing a cookie-cutter program that isn't tailored to each
individual.
- Not doing significant personal interviews and needs assessments
of the expat and his family prior to the training session.
- Utilizing a cultural generalist who has little or no in-depth
experience with the actual country.
- Failing to make the training interactive and experiential. The
best trainers are flexible and act as a mix between a trainer and a
coach.
- Hiring a trainer who has an understanding of the culture but
little or no relevant business experience. The ability to make
cultural information applicable to a specific company or business
field is key.
If you have additional best practices to share of how (or how not)
to prepare international assignees, please get in touch with me at
ngoodman@global-dynamics.com.