You are using one of your free views. If you are a member or would like to become one to continue access to this content, please click here.

From Making It Stick to Making It Last: How to Keep ROI and Results-Based Training Efforts on Track Premium Content

Friday, March 25, 2011 - by Holly Burkett

Send to Kindle

Keeping a results-based evaluation and return-on-investment process on track is one of biggest implementation challenges for evaluation professionals. In many ways, it's equivalent to training for a marathon. You start small with manageable goals, stretch your muscles, change your habits, celebrate milestone events, and then wait for the training and preparation to kick in so you can go the distance. Yet "going the distance" represents only half of the journey. Staying on track and maintaining the health and integrity of the ROI process in the face of continuous change is equally critical and an aspect of results-based evaluation work that is often overlooked and underestimated.

Building evaluation capacity takes time, commitment, constant reinforcement, and dedicated resources. The key is to keep moving and avoid prolonged inertia. Specific actions that facilitate movement are called enabling strategies and include the following:

Continually engage sponsors. Simply put, sponsors must approve necessary resources to initiate, maintain, and sustain evaluation projects, especially beyond the life-cycle of a single impact study. Sponsors also provide a critical chain of accountability for managers or individuals assigned with providing results data. In general, a credible sponsor is needed to provide direction, motivation, and support, and to convey a results orientation in both action and words. Effective sponsors also recognize that a well-managed evaluation process may entail personal, political, and organizational costs, and is willing to pay them. For example, when managers who should be acting as WLP advocates do not do their job well, the sponsor must communicate a resolve for stakeholders to support evaluation strategies as planned.

Use effective project management strategies. Effective project management means that implementation plans remain manageable, flexible, and appropriately aligned with identified business needs. Recommendations include being realistic and starting small. Effective project management also includes incorporating strategies for managing risk and change issues that can potentially threaten the credibility and resource support needed to successfully implement and integrate the ROI process. Regardless of how mature the ROI process may be, risk and change issues can occur at any stage of implementation.

Build and maintain infrastructures. Sustaining a results-based evaluation process involves integrating it with organizational and functional business processes and incorporating and communicating operating standards as part of infrastructure development. Underestimating the lead-time needed to create compatible support structures is a common factor in the failure of sustainable ROI implementation and any similar business process re-engineering effort. According to one ROI professional, "Our biggest initial barrier was we were almost too early for our own good and what I mean by that is we jumped to ROI without really having a solid base of measurement and evaluation within our organization."

Incorporate continuous improvement mechanisms. As implementation of the ROI process becomes more standardized and visible, and as the competition for resources becomes more intense, continuous improvement mechanisms are needed to make sure results generated by the methodology are still adding value. One such mechanism involves using a WLP scorecard or dashboard that tracks evaluation results for a single program or a series of programs. This allows stakeholders to use results, case studies, or lessons learned for continuous improvement purposes and informed decision making about which initiatives are contributing to strategic goals and which are not.

Provide continuing education and development. Developing the capability of available resources is especially critical since many organizations have turned to core teams of subject matter experts to initiate and lead ROI implementation efforts. These project managers may not have defined roles or responsibilities in training or may lack formal training in evaluation. In general, project teams are often challenged by a general lack of understanding about the ROI process, preexisting ideas about measurement, unrealistic expectations about the process, or fear about how results data will be used - all of which can be partially countered by continuing education and development.

Communicate, communicate, communicate. Constant, continual communication of results is a common factor citied by professionals who have successfully integrated the ROI process for five years of longer. This includes sharing success stories throughout the organization in the form of case studies or reports. Keeping ROI projects and results visible to leaders in all departments is important, since they can help champion future efforts.

Strengthen partnerships. Ultimately, the task of sustaining the ROI process over time is not the sole responsibility of the WLP function. Partnerships secure and foster ongoing support, cooperation, interaction, and dedication of individuals and groups across all organizational levels, especially in times of diminishing or scarce resources. One ROI professional has described partnership in terms of "shuttle diplomacy," a critical influencing process used to filter organizational noise, counter barriers, and influence stakeholders about the value of results-based measures of WLP effectiveness.

Add and create value. Value creation is just as important as value delivery. In the early stages of adopting the ROI process, the focus is typically on proving the worth or value of the training or HRD function. However, as the methodology becomes more embedded, a multiplier effect of value creation often takes place as results generated from the ROI process provides value-added, evidence-based feedback about investment decisions to key decision makers.

Putting it all together

There are no shortcuts to building a sustainable results-based measurement process. It takes time, effort, and a dedicated desire to persevere in the face of change or resistance. Keep in mind, however, that the payoff from that commitment will help transform the strategic role of workplace learning in your organization, improve efficiency in training design, development, and delivery, and increase respect, support, and commitment from the senior executives and major program sponsors who seek and approve resources for value-added performance solutions.

One of the best pieces of advice for any WLP professional seeking to standardize the ROI process as a way of doing business is this: Commit to the long haul!

From Making It Stick to Making It Last: How to Keep ROI and Results-Based Training Efforts on Track

Communities of Practice:   Learning & Development

Enter your email address

Become a member today to gain full access to www.astd.org, or enter your email address above for a sneak peek at exclusive member content. Learn more about ASTD Membership.

Already a member of ASTD? Please sign in to access this resource.

Authored By:

  • Holly Burkett headshot
    Holly Burkett
    Holly Burkett, SPHR, CPT is principal of Evaluation Works, in Davis, California, where she manages a consulting practice focused on helping organizations measure the business value of WLP efforts. A certified ROI professional, she is frequent presenter, workshop leader, and author. Most recently she authored the "Action Planning" chapter in the ASTD Handbook for Measuring and Evaluating Training (2010).