You are using one of your free views. If you are a Links Plus subscriber please sign in. If you would like to become one to continue access to this content, please click here.

Ten Ways to Measure Learning Impact Premium Content

Premium Content: This article is part of Links Plus, a premium ASTD subscription.

Saturday, February 27, 2010 - by Ron Cowan

Send to Kindle

At a recent learning conference, managers of two insurance companies and a technology company shared 10 ways that organizations measure impact of training.

We'd like to report each of the companies has a strategic, scientific way of doing so, but that would be a stretch. What we did find is that in one way or another, our three companies deploy informal and formal ways of measuring learning retention or checking for performance mastery.

Let's face it, measurement is a puzzle that we're all looking to solve. Here is a sampling of some of the ways the organizations are approaching measurement of learning impact:

1. Learning progress report

The report tool provides learners and their managers with an authentic performance assessment or summary of progress - like a "report card" in electronic format. The tool:

  • enables gathering, storing, and communicating of instructor ratings of learner achievement, and individual recommendations for additional learning activities
  • ensures field line managers are engaged in the learning process and helps with transfer of learning to the field
  • posts completed reports in a learner's LMS history with access only available to the learner and immediate manager, who receive an email with a direct link to the report.

Information obtained from this tool is for employee knowledge and skill development only and is not legally defensible to base employee career actions on the results. A different approach might be to use your LMS if there is a "learning plans" or similar feature to track progress.

2. Practice and skill checks

Practice and skill checks are used at varying levels and in different ways. Integrating practice and skills checks:

  • allows learners to practice the real task they will do on the job and checks for skill development.
  • demonstrates learners can DO the task, rather than hold knowledge.
  • provides criteria for the practice partner/skill checker to help them evaluate how well the learner performed the task and provides a way for coaches/supervisors to give great feedback!

Ask yourself if knowing about something is enoughor are you really after performance?

3. Final test - mastery

Two of the companies are working toward implementing performance-based training as the standard for courseware. To make the transition, evaluating the performer's mastery is the key. Performance-based training:

  • continues the practice and skill checks, but checks for mastery
  • provides a final integrated skill check that measures final results of the learning. For instance, a sales person models a sales conversation...from the greeting, to the conversation, to systems used - and finally closing the sale and the referral - ties it all together to make sure the learner can demonstrate an end-to-end process
  • provides a skill check criteria list to help your skill checkers gain very specific feedback. By the time the learner gets to the final, they should be ready to roll.

4. Transfer of learning techniques

Informal techniques for transfer of learning with the core curricula courses can be used in a variety of ways resulting in different outcomes.

  • Supervisor and employee pre- and post-training discussions - Most courses include a discussion guide for these two parties to discuss expectations of what the learner will learn before the training and how they will use lessons learned after the training.
  • Accountability cards - Can be pre-printed or 3 x 5 index cards to be used for the learner to list specific behaviors they pledge to implement after training. Cards can be used by an individual, with a partner, direct supervisor, or team member.
  • Accountability partners - Used when trying to change specific behavior that requires coaching and observation. Partners can be sounding boards as they work through performance improvement.

5. Balanced scorecard

Scorecards are an intentional way to measure the impact of training. This formal methodology requires commitment to analysis and tracking. Outcomes include

  • results matched to vision and strategy of company or department
  • objectives tracked to action plans and steps
  • measurements as detailed or as general as desired.

6. Competency development impact assessment

The adoption of enterprise competencies and the outline of expected behavior is one way to apply them to learning, talent, and performance management. Using assessment tools focusing on measurement of business impact, transfer of learning to the workforce, and enhanced productivity will allow your organization to:

  • tailor and electronically distribute questionnaires at pre-determined times to ask participants and their managers where they can demonstrate key learning initiatives to make a significant difference in improving performance and results
  • gain reporting capability, which reduces the show-stopper time and resources previously required to gather this important data. It is integrated with LMS for ease of use, ease of distribution, data collection and reporting.

7. Adoption reporting

This reporting shows whether the solution reached the intended learners and measures learning activity (for example, completions, page or site visits, and learner contributions). It includes:

  • compliance and general metrics - sales and production
  • percentage of employees using learning methodology, service, product, and task
  • tying activity and measurements of training to enterprise vision and strategies.

Adoption goals and measurements are important to gauge change management of an initiative, vision, strategy or project (for example, use of a new process)

8. 'Listening' software to measure informal learning

A new way to measure the impact of informal learning is by using marketing software that"listens" to the use of social media. The investigation looks to see if the organization should:

  • troll internal social learning media - learning blogs, wikis, and other tools to analyze for trends and comments
  • attempt to measure learning by factors such as strength, sentiment, passion, and reach.
  • try to discover what is the 'emotion' and use that information to come up with learning program solution decisions.

9. Needs analysis

All three companies conduct needs analyses with a methodology to determine what currently exists in the workforce and what skills and behaviors are needed to achieve business goals. This analysis:

  • includes asking business stakeholders what the key business needs are and what learners need to learn and do to have an impact on business results
  • involves assessing learners to determine their current state performance compared to the desired state, or what the business requires them to do to be successful
  • drives the objectives, content, and design of the learning solutions and the evaluation plan
  • proves necessary to determine the learning solutions return on expectation with stakeholders.

10. What about social media and mobile learning?

We know the world is changing. They way we teach and the way we learn change daily.

  • Should we measure the impact of informal and mobile learning? The answer is probably "that depends."
  • If informal and mobile learning are a big part of your culture, you may want to look for ways to measure the impact.
  • Try using nontraditional methodsbe creative and think "out of the box."

Changing times call for changing techniques!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Factors to Consider When Measuring the Impact of Training

It takes time and resources to measure the impact of any training. There are several questions all three organizations used to determine what to measure and how to measure it.

  • How critical is the initiative to the success of the organization? The more important it is to the enterprise, the more important it is to know if the training has made an impact.
  • How frequently will the content, system, or process change? If you're constantly changing the training, then it will be difficult to establish a base line for measurement and the data may not be relevant.
  • Are there legal concerns about measuring the impact of the training (compliance issues)?
  • Are you measuring confidence, competence or both?
  • Do you have the infrastructure to provide the necessary data for measurement analysis?
  • What do you plan to do with the information? Are you REALLY going to use it?
  • Will your organization's culture embrace the idea of any kind of measurement?
  • What accountability is in place to ensure measurement and transfer of learning takes place?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ron Cowan is manager of Learning Strategy Execution at XEROX CORPORATE HR - Global Learning Services. Carolyn Hansen is manager of learning development & services, corporate learning & development for COUNTRY Financial.

Ten Ways to Measure Learning Impact

Communities of Practice:   Learning & Development

Enter your email address to receive one-time free access to this subscriber-only resource:

Subscribe today to gain full access to ASTD Links Plus Premium Content, or enter your email address above for a sneak peek at exclusive subscriber content.

Already a Links Plus Subscriber? Please sign in to access this resource.

Authored By: