Simulations, which are often used in the training of pilots,
military personnel, and health professionals, are turned to when it
is too expensive or dangerous to allow students to use the real
equipment and when a mistake would be costly. For example, flight
simulators are used to train pilots to operate aircraft in
extremely hazardous situations without placing a real aircraft, as
well as the student and instructor, in danger. This process of
interactive learning through critical thinking and problem solving
creates a much stronger learning environment than traditional
passive instruction.
FATS, or firearms training simulator system, is one of the primary
training tools used by both the United States military and law
enforcement for marksmanship and use of force. The law enforcement
training program at Wake Technical Community College is using FATS
to help law enforcement officers in the Research Triangle Park of
North Carolina make better decisions when it comes to firing their
weapons.
The FATS system is no different from the flight simulator. It
creates an interactive learning process through evaluation,
assessment, and judgment of the law enforcement officer in the use
of deadly force. The simulator is a computer that projects
life-size people onto a screen and interacts with one or as many as
four students at one time. The weapons used are real firearms,
flashlights, and OC spray (Oleoresin Capsicum, also known as pepper
spray) that have been converted to fire a laser beam onto the
screen. The virtual scenarios are based on real-life situations
that have proven deadly to some officers in the field, and the
computer measures the laser hits and reports the student's
outcomes.
The FATS system also allows virtual targets to move and talk to the
student. The virtual people in the scenarios may be shouting
profane language with hostile body language or calmly asking
questions of the student. They may be armed with handguns, rifles,
or knives, or may possess no weapon at all. A gas-operated gun that
fires rubber bullets can be shot at the student to simulate shots
fired by the offender.
Complement to Traditional Training
Most law enforcement officers have been trained to shoot a
stationary target on a firing range. For example, in Northern
Carolina must be qualified annually on an approved course of fire
with the minimum score of 70 percent for both day and night with
their firearm. A firearms instructor will place an officer on a
firing range to shoot a paper target under time at different
distances. The firearms instructor then gives commands to shoot or
cease firing, and the officer must react to the instructions given.
While this meets the state requirement of firearms qualification
and is effective to measure accuracy of the shooter, it does not
measure judgmental shooting. Any law enforcement officer who uses
deadly force must be able to adequately justify their reasons as to
why this was the approbated course of action.
In contrast, the FATS system's main feature is to train the student
for judgmental shooting. This training includes force escalation or
de-escalation and shoot or no shoot situations. The interaction
with the FATS simulator also measures the student's basic
fundamentals of marksmanship, as with any type of traditional
firearms qualification course. But a bonus feature of the FATS
simulator is the ability to measure the student's reaction time and
muzzle trace during a scenario. A student can be shown where their
firearm was pointing at all times, which allows the student to see
if they were on the correct target before firing the first round.
How It Works
As with most simulators used in training, the FATS system is
operated by a highly skilled instructor. The simulator's computer
branching technology, based on the idea of a decision tree, allows
the instructor to determine in which direction the scenario might
proceed, and to escalate or de-escalate a scenario depending on the
actions of the student. Several possible outcomes are already
loaded into the system. The instructors also know how to ask
questions that reflect current law on the use of force and give
constructive feedback to ensure a positive learning experience.
After determining that there is no live ammunition or firearms in
the training space to prevent accidental discharge, the instructor
explains that the officer will face a number of scenarios--from
armed robbery, to domestic disturbances, to excessive noise. So, as
in the real world, the officer could go from unknown dangers to a
dangerous situation to an everyday citizen noise complaint. The
officer is also reminded about North Carolina law as it relates to
use of force, and an agency representative often discusses agency
policy. The officer is told to keep surroundings familiar. The room
is set up to simulate the elements that could be used as cover by
an officer in the real world. For example, a plywood cutout of a
vehicle door could be in the room for the officer to use as cover
while returning fire. A doorway is used to practice cover and
concealment. Officers are informed that the simulator may "shoot
back," and safety goggles are used to prevent rubber bullets from
hitting students in the eyes.
Students who have gone through the simulator have reported
experiencing high stress. The student must engage verbally with
targets while assessing body language, surroundings, and other
possible threats, and some officers are surprised when they are
struck by a rubber bullet because they failed to stop the threat or
seek cover. Other officers have reported that while they did well
at traditional firearms qualification, they had difficulty
multitasking and formed tunnel vision during the scenario. Yet
after completing the first scenario, every officer improved on
their performance.
The FATS simulator is not intended to take the place of firearms
qualification. It is a tool used to prepare, assess, and evaluate
an officer's judgmental use of force while not endangering the
officer and others. In 2006, 142 law enforcement officers in the
United States died in the line of duty. The bulk of those deaths
were by handguns. These officers were not rookies; their average
experience was 10 years and 9 months, and their average age was 37.
If simulation training can prevent one officer from being killed in
the line of duty and allows them to return safely to their
families, the time and expense spent in the activity is most
certainly well worth it.
2007 ASTD, Alexandria, VA. All rights reserved.