The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in
Washington, DC,
released its page-turner, Securing Cyberspace for the 44th
Presidency, in December
2008. The report covers the sobering cybersecurity challenge
(protection
of Internet data, systems, and networks) that President Obama
faces. It spotlights
the threats and reviews recommendations revolving around national
security,
while urging the safeguarding of privacy and civil liberties. The
report
declares cybersecurity an urgent, strategic national security issue
as perilous as
weapons of mass destruction and global jihad. This chilling
challenge impacts
the entire nation and beckons public management practitioners and
academics
to address its implications.
Escalating Security Threats
Economic and national security threats to the United States from
cyberspace
(the virtual place where online communications occur) grow
annually.
A mushrooming underground economy scams computer users to the tune
of
$100 billion a year. Recently, the New York Times concluded that
thieves profit
tremendously in cyber conflicts. Patrick Lincoln, director of the
computer
science laboratory at SRI International, is quoted as saying, Right
now, the
bad guys are improving more quickly than the good guys. Several
Business
Week articles over the past year relate a rising number of security
gaps amid
sensitive computer networks. For example, in fiscal year 2008, the
Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) wrestled with nearly thirteen thousand
cybersecurity incidents, a 150 percent increase from the prior
year. In the
summer
of 2007, Newsweek reports
that 1,500 Pentagon computers were
hacked. The Department of Defense
acknowledges that the military copes
with over three million digital intrusions
to official networks daily.
The CSIS report verifies that
foreign opponents invade U.S. computer
networks and capture valuable
data regularly. Corporate losses
measure in the billions. Such attacks
threaten the economy as antagonistic
interests gain access to corporate
business plans, intellectual property,
supply chain information, and customer
communications. This erodes
the dividends from innovation and
unintentionally underwrites the research
and development of international
competitors. Failure to defend
cyberspace adequately encourages
more attacks. Moreover, the global
strategic environment means cyberspace
vulnerabilities offer high value
targets to antagonistic interests.
Commission on Cybersecurity
The mission of the CSIS Commission
on Cybersecurity, established
in August 2007, is to review U.S.
preparedness. Further, it is tasked
with formulating a comprehensive
national approach to cybersecurity
for consideration by the forty-fourth
president. The commission finds that
(1) cybersecurity poses a pressing national
security issue, (2) action in this
arena must be swift while reinforcing
privacy and civil liberties, and (3)
nothing short of a comprehensive
national strategy, encompassing both
domestic and international facets,
will increase U.S. security.
Recommendations for
President Obama
Presidential Leadership
The commission urges a comprehensive
national security strategy
for cyberspace. Such a strategy should
follow a presidential pronouncement
that the cyber infrastructure constitutes
an essential asset for the U.S.
economy and national security. It
would place hackers on notice that
the United States will employ diplomatic,
intelligence, military, law enforcement,
and economic power to
protect this asset. Such a pronouncement
signals unfriendly interests that
the United States will marshal resources
to ensure resiliency and continuity
of service. The commissions
report suggests this may even involve
taking the offensive with attackers.
Cybersecurity leadership needs
to be based in the White House. The
commission proposes an office for
cyberspace in the executive office of
the president and the creation of new
supporting public-private advisory
groups. It recommends consolidation
of existing efforts with the National
Security Council to defend national
networks while preserving privacy
and civil liberties. This action refines
strategic focus, reduces mission overlaps,
improves collaboration, and establishes
accountability.
The commission counsels President
Obama to direct priority toward
education and training for cybersecurity
leadership. This acknowledges
that cyberspace represents a
vast realm for international conflict
and competition and currently the
advantage rests with attackers. The
United States needs a cadre of cyber
security experts with ongoing training
and career paths for recruitment
and retention. Financial aid from the
National Science Foundation scholarship
program to accredited curricula
could expand the pool of skilled
professionals. Federal training centers
should provide elementary cyber
skills and develop a national cyber
skills certification program. Concurrent
with the proposed education and
training component, the commission
advocates an enhanced investment in
research and development to advance
a less vulnerable cyber ecosystem to
support this vital national interest.
Two goals for this endeavor involve
developing a national research and
technology agenda and encouraging
multidisciplinary collaboration.
Legal and Regulatory Initiatives
Legal and budgetary authorities
pertaining to federal cybersecurity
must be modernized. The Federal
Information Security Management
Act requires overhauling to shield
governmentconnected systems from
attacks and known vulnerabilities.
The commission recommends that
this include performance assessment.
Further, the historic distinction between
civilian and national security
systems must be replaced with a riskbased
orientation that demands privacy
impact appraisals. As part of the
legal review, the statutory framework
for pursuing criminal investigations
of Internet crime needs updating.
The primary task here is to engage
Congress in legislation designed to
speed investigations while protecting
the privacy of legitimate users.
Cyberspace demands regulation.
On the basis of threat assessment
levels, the United States must secure
sustainability of critical services in
cyberspace through defending criti-
cal cyber infrastructures and issuing
standards. The commission identifies
energy, finance, convergence of information
technology and communications,
and government services (including
state and local governments)
as essential cyber infrastructures. It
suggests a new regulatory approach
that avoids overreliance on market
forces. Public-private partnerships
should concentrate on infrastructures
while coordinating protocols
for protection and response. Performance
security metrics and enforceable
standards require development.
Mandate Authentication
The commission calls for mandating
authentication (verifying user
identity and the integrity of transmitted
messages) for access to vital
cyberspace infrastructure. It suggests
that consumers be permitted to utilize
government-authorized credentials
for Internet transactions so long
as privacy and civil liberties continue
uncompromised. Commercial operations
would be managed on a riskbased
credentialing process. This ensures
that market interests could not
compel government-supplied credentials
for all Internet activities.
Revamp Procurement
Recognizing that the federal
government is the largest consumer
of information technology, acquisition
policies should mandate secure
cyber products. Security features for
information technology products and
telecommunications carriers demand
immediate action. This recommendation
encourages sharing of federal
configurations with state and local
governments and collaborative partnerships
with industry.
Where to Start?
The commission recommends
building on the Bush administrations
Comprehensive National Cybersecurity
Initiative. While critical
of the secrecy surrounding the Bush
effort, the commission evaluates it as
a workable foundation from which
a new administration can transform
the cybersecurity environment. President
Obama has the opportunity
to reinvent the U.S. approach to an
evolving international environment
dependent on a secure cyberspace.
Under his leadership the country can
reduce risks, increase resiliency, and
position itself to exploit the advantages
of cyberspace.
Public Management Implications
Seeds of service opportunities lie
within the commissions report across
the field of public management. Public
management practitioners and
academics can supply the expertise to
guide the effort in the following areas:
Leading intersectoral collaboration
and problem-solving while
facilitating intergovernmental relations
surrounding cybersecurity
Developing budgetary means to
feed the cybersecurity initiative
with performance accountability
Educating and training cyber
professionals
Developing job classifications
and career ladders while honing
a compensation system to attract
and to retain cyber professionals
Formulating and executing public
policy in modernizing legal
authorities and related issues
Proposing a research agenda to
support cybersecurity and associated
activities
Developing security performance
indicators for measurement
and program evaluation
Tailoring procurement practices
to ensure that cyber infrastructure
standards are frontloaded
in acquisition specifications.
President Obama can confront
this chilling challenge by establishing
a security structure to counter cybersecurity
threats. The commissions report
lays the foundation from which
to address this national service opportunity.
Public managers must be
in the forward trenches of this battle.