You are using one of your free views. If you are a TPM Magazine subscriber please sign in. If would like to become one to continue access to this content, please click here.

The Value of Smart Power in a Time of Transition Premium Content

Friday, July 18, 2008 - by TPM Staff

Send to Kindle

The latest in Joe Nye's series of books about leadership and power, The Powers

to Lead, builds upon his earlier writing concerning the paradox of power and

the increasingly important concept of soft power to define a more advanced

resource for leaders in government: smart power. Drawing upon case studies,

a review of the vast literature about leadership, and his own experience in government

and academia, Nye has produced a valuable primer for students and

practitioners on the relationship between leadership and power. In fact, he says

he was motivated to write this book when he was preparing to teach a course

on leadership at the Kennedy School and could find no such treatment that

combined theory, analysis, and case examples. Leadership can be learned, according

to the author, though experience seems to contribute immensely to

the nuanced use of smart power.

Soft and Hard Power

He argues that effective leadership requires smart powerthe strategic use

of either hard or soft power skills or, in most cases, a combination of the two,

depending on the context of the situation.We all recognize hard powercommand

and control, carrots and sticks to change behavior, and organization of

people and processes to produce desired outcomes. Soft power skills are more

often connected to feminine traitscollaboration, persuasion, empathy, and the

ability to attract others and build ownership of visionary change. In a technologyenabled,

networked world, the value and use of soft power skills by both women

and men in a variety of positions, in all sectors, are on the rise. For the Millennials, ages eighteen to thirty, the exercise

of soft power through a variety

of networks is such a natural act that

it seems to be part of their DNA.Some

experience may be required for these

young leaders to advance to the level

of smart power;on the other hand, they

may define yet another level or concept

to meet future challenges.

Transformational leaders tend to

use soft power more than hard power,

though not exclusively; transactional

leaders and managers are more focused

on structures and processes that include

incentives and rewards to influence behavior

and produce desired results.This

is a somewhat simplistic version of

Nyes framework of leadership styles

and power skill sets,but it sets the stage

for his new concept of smart power, in

which leaders choose from a menu of

hard and soft resources, skills, and

styles to achieve either a transactional

or transformational outcome, with

sensitivity to current trends, changing

attitudes, and situational context.

For example, Mayor Rudy Giuliani,

more associated with using hard

power skills to clean up and improve

the safety and quality of life in New

York City, intuitively chose soft empathetic

and communication skills to

lead, comfort, and inspire people in his

city and across the country after the

September 11 attacks on the World

Trade Center.Such an effective choice

of either soft empathy or hard operational

command and control skills

was not evident in the leadership of the

response to Hurricane Katrina, until

Admiral Thad Allen assumed federal

leadership in a chaotic, desperate situation

with a simple direction to all

federal workers on the scene (until

more specific commands and controls

could be established):Treat everyone

as if they were a member of your family

you will know what to do.

Transition Skills

Nye says that contextual intelligence

will be a key skill for the next

president.Contextual intelligence is

the intuitive diagnostic skill that helps

you align your tactics with your objectives

so that you get smart strategies

in different situations.

Okay, so lets try out our contextual

intelligence to consider leadership

styles and smart power tools in a time

of transition.Transition is defined in

Websters as a movement from one

form, stage,or style to another. Its synonym

is change.

Change is definitely on the horizon

as we prepare for a historic presidential

transition and a massive

turnover in the federal workforce as

baby boomers retire in a wave described

by some as a tsunami. Both

transitions are taking place in the

context of increasingly rapid growth of

interactive communications technology,

which is flattening, not only the

world, according toTom Friedman,but

virtually all organizations, structures,

enterprises, and group relationships.

More contextthis presidential

transition comes at a time when our

representative democracy, our government,

is faced with a multitude of

indicators and trends going in the

wrong direction or not keeping pace

with others around the world. Partisanship

is up, confidence in government

is down (confidence in the

Congress and president has sunk to historic

low points), budget deficits and

the national debt are up and up, education

and health are not keeping pace

with other countries, and energy and

global climate change are creating

pain and anxiety in households and

communities across the nation.

The good news may be that we

will have new leadership, grounded in

this sobering reality,and the engagement

in this election of people who want

change in order to solve big problems.

The challenges we face are daunting.

The stakes are high as the demand

for change increases along with concern

about the negative consequences

of ineffective leadership.What combination

of hard, soft, and smart power

should the next president and his top

appointees choose in this context?

What approach and tools should career

government leaders use to increase the

odds that the upcoming presidential

and workforce transitions will produce

better outcomes for the people served

by public managers?

Leading from the Middle

Rather than trying to channel

smart power strategies to the presidential

candidates and their yet-to-bedetermined

top team, leading from the

middle seems more constructive. In The

Powers to Lead,Nye points out thatmost

people lead from the middle to influence

the behavior of both the boss or

bosses and subordinates.There are ways

to prepare, personally and organizationally,

to embrace the potential of new

leadership, such as the following:

Prepare yourself personally, engage

your team, broaden your

network, and take some risks to

help new appointees understand

their new context and their

choices as leaders.

Understand your new context by

paying attention to the candidates

and their priorities, and draw

upon your team and network to

come up with ideas to improveoutcomes for the people you

serve, with a new framework of

priorities in mind.

Welcome the transition team and

new appointees with a clear picture

of the current situation and

some practical steps to achieve

what can be with their new

agenda.

Connect (indirectly or directly as

appropriate) with the people you

servelisten and understand their

concerns and their priorities, evaluate

the impact of your actions on

them, and give them the information

they need to hold you and

your new leaders accountable for

progress and results.

This advice leans on the use of soft

power, but hard power should also

come into play with respect to systematic

measures of performance,

evaluation of the impact of the approaches,

and interventions of an

agency or network on the intended

mission or desired outcome.

Soft and hard power choices are

mostly aimed at the supply side of effective

government. Harnessing your

team and network, using technology,

performance measures, and other

toolswith discipline and high ethical

standardscan improve the supply

of transactions and even transform the

culture of the suppliers.What about the

demand side? A troubling trend for

many government decision makers is

that the external demand for effective

leadership is often trumped by the demands

of organized special interests.

What combination of soft and hard

power can change this equation? Can

the demand for leadership in the

public interest be informed and engaged

enough to become a force for

realizing government of, by, and for

the people?

Other Perspectives

A few thoughts about the use of

soft and hard power in this regard by

leaders inside and outside of government

follow:

Hold appointed leaders more

clearly accountable for progress

and outcomes, not just by measuring

overall program performance

but by making it more

personalfor example, asking for

a commitment to a few critical

goals and measuring progress in a

transparent way.

Publish user-friendly progress reports

on public priorities with

facts (sometimes brutal facts) and

indicators of progress, decline,

whats working, whats not, and

plans for improvement by government

leaders.

Use quantitative survey research

and qualitative discussions and

feedback to factor in the public

perspective on priorities and

tough tradeoffs into decisions

about policy and implementation

actions.

Independently produce scorecards

for legislators on their commitments

in areas of public priority,

factual indicators of progress, and

approval ratings by their constituents,

with local media coverage.

Their elections should

depend on these factors as much

as the ratings of their voting

records by special interest groups.

Demand for Effective Leadership

If not these approaches, what can

be done to enhance the demand for effective

public leadership?

One final leadership challenge is

related to the workforce transition:

what combination of soft, hard, or

smart power skills can be applied to attract

and recruit the next generation

of leaders and more experienced leaders

to government servicepersuasion,

incentives, or a combination?

We all know about the brain

drain from government, as huge numbers

of senior executives and civil servants

become eligible to retire. The

competition for talented workers in the

future between public and private

employers will be fierce. Recent surveys

show that a majority ofAmericans

now say that government service

would be appealing, with more than

one-third ofMillennials expressing significant

interest in working for the federal

government.They are attracted,not

only by the missions, but by the intellectual

stretch and growth potential.

Many are also attracted by flexible

work schedules and student loan repayment

incentives.

A recent Gallup survey found

that 60 percent of young people and

70 percent over thirty say they have

never been asked to consider government

service.But if asked by their parents

or the next president, a significant

share say they would seriously consider

it.The next president tops the list of

motivators for those over thirty.This offers

an exciting possibility for the

next president to use his soft power of

persuasion to reprise President

Kennedys call: Ask not what your

country can do for you; ask what you

can do for your country.

Those who are leading from the

middle can also asksoftly and follow

up with some hard incentives. Smart

powerthe combination of hard and

soft power skillsuses contextual intelligence

as a guide.Thank you, Joe

Nye, for this insightful and accessible

book for public leaders at all levels.

The Value of Smart Power in a Time of Transition

Communities of Practice:   Government , Workforce Development

Enter your email address to receive one-time free access to this subscriber-only resource:

Subscribe to The Public Manager today to gain full access to this journal.

Authored By: