The nation faces an enormous challenge but has the opportunity to
institute
change through collaboration among top-level government and
private-sector executives. Americans want an effective, efficient,
and
results-driven government as we move through the twenty-first
century.We
have great opportunities to leverage information technology (IT) in
areas such
as economic development, education, health care, homeland security,
publicsafety, and worker productivity. Does the nations government
have the highly trained and talented top-level
executives critical in promoting innovative ideas and
growth through the use of IT? The answer is No.
The governments process for hiring the top-level
executives needed to implement this change-whenchallenged
approach appears to be broken.Government
does not attract the best talent; instead, young people shy
away from public service because they fear the bureaucracy
moves too slowly for their career development
paths.This top talent is crucial in leading government
organizations to success using current IT capabilities and
those yet to be discovered.
Our nations top executives need to understand
how to
reinvigorate government by transforming todays
organizations,
use current and future technologies to institute
change in government, and
establish national goals beyond the current Presidents
Management Agenda (PMA).
Reinvigorating Government
Reinvigorating the federal government requires
changing the negative image many have of being a federal
employee. Changing this image will help the government
recruit the best top-level executives, who can
serve as change agents as they address our current and
future IT challenges. Unfortunately, many of those who
seek change are criticized for their desire to modify
processes that others see as not broken.Thus, many
current government change leaders face punishment
rather than reward for the impact they have on process
and policy.
Federal government efforts to attract talent and
maintain institutional knowledge (in the face of downsizing,
hiring freezes, attrition, and budget cutbacks)
must be strategic.One approach is to hire younger leaders
into the Senior Executive Service ranks or to hire effective
senior private-sector managers to become part of
the leadership hierarchy.The latter would challenge savvy
business leaders with the opportunity to break down the
twentieth-century stereotype of government bureaucracy,
molding it into an environment willing to accept
change.The current presidential candidates have yet to
address this issue.
Leveraging Technology
In a globally competitive environment, the United
States must address the expanded use of IT to stay competitive.
Many worry that China is taking our jobs, but
its gross domestic product (GDP) is $1.6 trillion, while
we have a $16 trillion economy with less than one-quarter
of Chinas population.The real threat to our competitive
status is that the top Chinese leaders, many of
whom have advanced degrees in engineering, see technology
as a means to achieve national goals.To stay competitive,
the United States must develop a more dynamic
educational system, one that can enable future political
and agency leaders to grasp the power of IT and understand
how it can be used to help America maintain its
strong position in the global economy.
Many top federal government executives today dont
understand how to use a BlackBerry, let alone leverage
a simple idea like usingWeb technologies to communicate
with the public or adroitly integrate two agencies
with complicated policies and technologies for a common
solution (health care, for example). One solution
to this problem would be to ask major businesses to
loan their top executives to agencies for a time to instill
the changes needed to improve government.
Establishing National Goals
The current PMA is an aggressive strategy for improving
the management and effectiveness of the federal
government.Although it is a good start, we need even
more vision and commitment from the next president to
engender ideas for improving the next generation of
government services.We need to look at how the federal
government uses IT, find out which uses work well, and
meet the challenges of implementing new networking
and IT to keep us competitive with other global
economies.
One initiative that could be included in the next
PMA would be to assemble the chief information officers
to leverage broadband capability to the populace
and improve government service delivery.The publicsimply needs
inexpensive high-speed communication
(broadband).
The Federal Communications CommissionsWeb
site offers some detail on what broadband can provide,
including the following (adapted from the site):
Access to a wide range of educational, cultural, and
recreational opportunities and resources
Provision of medical care to unserved and underserved
populations through remote diagnosis,
treatment, monitoring, and consultations with specialists
Electronic commerce (e-commerce) that can help
create new jobs, attract new industries, and offer
access to regional, national, and worldwide markets
Help in streamlining peoples interaction with
government agencies and information about government
policies, procedures, benefits, and programs
Public safety information and procedures, including
early warning/public alert systems and disaster
preparation programs,
remote security monitoring and real-time security
background checks, and
backup systems for public safety communications
networks
Access to new telecommunications technologies
such asVoice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), which
allows voice communication using the Internet
Ability to useTelecommunications Relay Services
(TRS) andVideo Relay Services (VRS) to communicate
more easily, quickly, and expressively
with voice telephone users.
Because of the wide scope of application, the lack of
high-speed broadband penetration is a national issue.
Government leaders appear to be taking a wait-and-see
approach regarding faster broadband rollout.The United
States now ranks fifteenth in the world in broadband
implementation,
down from fourth just a few years ago:
how long can we continue to have the largest GDP
when we are constantly dropping in the ranks of broadband
use? The next administration needs to take action
to move the United States into first place.To do so, we
must jettison old dogmatic policy and make way for the
next generation of technological advances.This change
will bring new opportunities for America to advance in
nanotechnology, biotechnology, Internet leverage, improved
graphical systems, and more.
Conclusion
A drastic change takes a great deal of knowledge and
courage, but we cant afford to maintain the status quo.
We need the courage to continue changing government.
Our candidates for president need to understand these
challenges, set an agenda involving smart executives and
next-generation technology, and begin communicating
it in their speeches to America.