DEmographic changes in the composition of the federal workforce are
posing
technical and adaptive challenges to the continued smooth
functioning of U.S.
government agencies. Agency officials must plan to replace an
unprecedented
percentage of highly skilled and trained employees retiring from
federal service,
and the remaining managers must learn to lead policy changes with a
younger generation that may not share the same values or career
goals as their
predecessors.
The federal government is not taking full advantage of
opportunities to
recruit or retain young people. Hiring managers can leverage a
variety of human
resource policies and programs to attract and hold onto new talent
for federal
government jobs.
This article quantifies the scope of this challenge by analyzing
human resource
data on workforce demographics and suggests strategies that federal
agencies
can use to attract and retain young talent based on a qualitative
analysis
of younger generations values and career goals.
Aging Federal Workforce
The federal government workforce is aging. According to human
resource
data from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), approximately
60 percent
of the 1.9 million employees of federal agencies will reach
retirement age
by 2017.
Members of the professional and administrative staffthe largest
category
of government employeesare highly educated and trained. They will
likely be the most important, but difficult,
segment of those retiring for managers
to replace. As the general population
also ages, federal agencies will have to
compete even harder with a private sector
that may be more prepared to offer
incentives for recruitment and retention.
At least 62 percent of the nearly
one million professionals and administrative
personnel who are non-seasonal,
full-time, permanent (NSFTP)
employees will be eligible to retire over
the next decade (Figure 1).
We will not have to wait ten years,
though, to start seeing the effects of this
demographic change. OPM data show
that an increasing number of NSFTP
professional and administrative federal
personnel are retiring each year in
absolute terms and as a percentage of
the total number of workers in this job
category.
In 2005, OPM projected that 18.5
percent, or nearly 300,000, NSFTP employees
would retire from federal service
in 200610. This estimate has
been close to the actual figures. In 2006
07, about 117,000 NSFTP federal personnel
retired, about 5,000 (17 percent)
more than expected.
Understanding Generational
Differences: Values and Career Goals
Effective leaders appreciate and
communicate in accordance with employees
values. However, most people
who have worked in a multigenerational
office recognize that individuals
of different ages often have age-specific
motivations and goals. This section
discusses how the values of Generations
X and Y may vary from those of their
parents and grandparents cohorts and
the implications these differences may
have for recruiting and retaining
younger federal workers.
The federal workforce features
four overlapping generations: traditionalists/
veterans, baby boomers,
Generation X/baby busters, and Generation
Y/millenials.
Traditionalists/Veterans
Born before the end of World War
II, traditionalists make up less than 10
percent of the federal workforce. In
2007, about 35 percent of traditionalists
working as professionals and administrative
personnel in the federal
government left their agencies. Nearly
all of those who left retired from federal
service (Figure 2).
Although exceptions abound, traditionalists
generally tend to value security,
loyalty, and persistence, even if
holding to these principles means deferring
or sacrificing some personal rewards.
They strengthen relationships at
work through camaraderie, teamwork,
and opportunities to mentor others.
Baby Boomers
Born after the end of World War
II through the 1960s, baby boomers
represent nearly 70 percent of federal
government employees. Many havealready left, and most of those
remaining
will be eligible to retire
within the next ten years.
One reason baby boomers below
the age of fifty-five have low secession
rates is that they were hired before 1984
and are therefore covered under the
Civil Service Retirement System
(CSRS). CSRS rewards employees
who joined the federal government early
in their careers and put in many years
of service. For example, a federal worker
with thirty years of service can retire
at age fifty-five and begin receiving
full benefits, even if leaving to take
a job in the private sector. However, retiring
or leaving federal service early has
penalties, so boomers enrolled in CSRS
rarely leave ahead of the allowed
schedule. The new retirement plan, the
Federal Employees Retirement System
(FERS), effective in 1987 for almost all
employees hired in 1984 or later, gives
workers more flexibility in deciding
when they want to retire. FERS allows
those with at least five years of creditable
civilian service to receive deferred
retirement benefits even if they have left
federal service before meeting the
minimum age and service requirements
for immediate or early benefits.
Baby boomers have proven adept
at adapting efficiently and professionally
to rapid changes in the workplace.
While they are frequent customers of
technical and logistics support, boomers
may seek out developmental and
networking opportunities to build and
use new skill sets. They are often competitively
compensated and are beginning
to seek additional health and retirement
benefits.
Generation X/Baby Busters
Born in the 1960s and 1970s,
Generation X is underrepresented in
the federal sector. OPM reported in
Getting the X into Senior Executive Service
that Generation X composes only
about 20 to 25 percent of the federal
workforce, but by some counts over 40
percent of the private sector. OPM
suggests this disparity may be due to
hiring freezes and downsizing in the
1990s, when this cohort entered the labor
market.
The U.S. Merit Systems Protection
Boards January 2008 report to the president
and Congress, Attracting the Next
Generation: A Look at Federal Entry-Level
New Hires, notes that 62 percent of
new hires to federal jobs (typically age
thirty or older) surveyed said that they
planned to stay in government until retirement.
However, actual data from
OPM fail to support these optimistic
predictions. In 2007, members of Generation
X had among the highest separation
rates from federal agencies relative
to other generations working in
government.
This behavior could be seen as evidence
of disloyalty or impatience,
demonstrating that these individuals are
only looking for short-term jobs, but
surveys cited by OPM show that
young people in their twenties and
thirties want, but do not expect to find,
long-term employment. Their eager,
results-oriented behavior may also be
affected by the need to pay off student
debts of tens to hundreds of thousands
of dollars.
Generation Xers also adapt well to
change and are characterized as possessing
high levels of confidence and
self-reliance. Highly valuing innovation,
creativity, and social responsibility
may lead them to more goal-oriented
but nontraditional workplaces,
where their technical skills will be recognized
and rewarded and where
they can access networking and developmental
opportunities.
Generation Y/Millennials
Born after 1980, individuals in this
generation are just beginning to join
the public and private sectors. Generation
Y represents less than 5 percent
of the federal workforce, but this proportion
will almost certainly expand
over the next ten years as younger people
are hired to fill gaps as managers to
replace retiring traditionalists and baby
boomers.
Federal agencies can dramatically
expand recruitment of young talent
through even a modest outreach to this
generation. Many young people are interested
in working in government, but
may not be sure how to enter the public
sector or overcome the various bureaucratic
obstacles to finding a federal
job. A May 2007 report by the Council
for Excellence in Government and
The Gallup Organization, Within
ReachBut Out of Synch, noted that
more than one-third of Generation Y
is interested in working in the federal
government.
Hiring managers and supervisors
will be better equipped to reach out to
young people if they understand the
younger cohorts values and goals. To
disseminate some lessons learned,
OPM has created models that hiring
agencies can use to target students, recent
graduates, and other new professionals.
According to Gallup polling
and OPMs guide, individuals in Generation
Y are looking for creative, innovative,
and meaningful work aligned
with their interests. Independent studies
have added that a strong sense of
mission, positive corporate culture,
and a feeling of corporate social responsibility
are also important attributes
for workplaces seeking to hire
more young people.
For this generation, learning and
empowerment in the workplace arestandard requirements. They are
looking
for meaningful work where they
can have an effect, but say they will
gravitate toward jobs that offer more
balanced work/life schedules.
Recommendations
Despite increasing rates of retirement,
the total number of government
employees has stayed about the same,
actually increasing by slightly less than
1 percent since 2003. However, federal
agencies are not taking full advantage
of opportunities created by opening
full-time employment slots to specifically
recruit young people (Figure 3).
To ensure a smooth transition
and continuity of government services
as older employees begin to retire en
masse, hiring managers can leverage a
variety of human resource policies and
programs to provide financial and
nonmonetary incentives. Retention is
especially important for positions that
require substantial on-the-job training.
Monetary Rewards
The federal government can offer
the following monetary rewards:
Recruitment, relocation, and retention
incentives
Merit-based pay and pay for performance,
which are emerging in the
private and public sectors as standard
systems for more competitive
compensation
Student loan repayment programs,
typically with a length-of-service
requirement, which have proven
popular with younger people coming
into the workplace who carry
enormous debts from their higher
education
Tuition reimbursement policies for
continuing education, which can be
used to encourage employees to attain
additional credentials without
necessarily leaving their agencies.
Professional Development
and Networking Opportunities
These opportunities are as follows:
High-quality professional development
and leadership development,
complemented by assignments
where employees can use those
skills
Opportunities to take on additional
responsibilities, such as leadership
responsibilities for nonsupervisory
positions
Developmental assignments, including
rotations outside federal government
to the private sector, state
and local government, foreign governments,
international organizations,
and non-governmental
organizations
Opportunities to connect and network
with peers
Mentoring programs can also benefit
older and younger cohorts by facilitating
the sharing of institutional
knowledge, such as agency or office
operations.
Other Nonmonetary Benefits
These nonmonetary benefits include
the following:
Emphasis on the importance of
mission and ability to impact and
effect change
Increased access and transparency
Broader variety of work
Improved diversity in the workplace,
such as through policies to
encourage continued education and
professional development for female
and minority staff members
Work/life balance, including options
to take advantage of flextime
schedules, telework, and child-care
and elder-care benefits.