Implementation 2.0
By Jay Cross

The Wall Street Journal, Business Week, Forbes, Stephen Colbert, the Manchester Guardian, Learning Circuits, and other leading voices can’t stop talking about Web 2.0. You’ve read the stories; the web is now the read/write web. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of 9.1 million articles in 253 languages, written entirely by volunteers. Facebook, YouTube, and Flickr are growing faster than the web in its meteoric growth phase. There are 70 million logs online, and 120,000 new logs are created every day (that’s about 1.4 new blogs per second). These phenomena are global; only 35 percent of all blogs are in English.

This is all well and good, but it provides no guidance to the manager who wants to take advantage of the new technologies. Managers need to know the opportunities and the pitfalls, applications and benefits, tricks of the trade and lessons of experience.  

 

Indeed, the web is chock full of explanations of blogs, tags, and other social software. I interviewed scores of people to capture their thoughts on the human side of implementing and sustaining collaborative networks. As you would expect, people have different notions of what works. I’ve tried to capture these multiple perspectives in the checklists and vignettes that follow.

 

Collaboration rules

 

Most people agree that when they work together rather than as solitary individuals, they produce greater results and derive more pleasure from their work. Until quite recently, collaboration was not easy, especially when distance was involved or people couldn’t access the same information or a worker couldn’t figure out who was the right person to contact. Those barriers are fading fast. Software and networks that support collaboration are in place and inexpensive. Everyone complains about departmental silos; social networks bore through silo walls.

 

I asked Harvard Business School’s Andrew McAfee, who coined the term "Enterprise 2.0," why he thinks social software will transform the business world. He told me that today’s collaborative technologies can knit together an enterprise and facilitate knowledge work in ways that were simply not possible previously. They have the potential to usher in a new era by making both the practices of knowledge work and its outputs more visible.

 

Many happy returns

Business has already squeezed the big process improvements out of its physical systems. But for many companies, collaboration and networking processes are virgin territory. The upside potential is staggering; people innovating, sharing, supporting one anotherall naturally and without barriers. The traditional approach has been to automate routine tasks in order to reduce cost; the new vision is to empower people to take advantage of their innate desire to share, learn together and innovate.

 

Web 2.0, the “collaborative web,” renders overstuffed file cabinets and hard drives overflowing with email obsolete. Members of a group can share information and make improvements to one copy that’s virtually available to everyone. Workers learn to remix rather than reinvent, and having everyone read from the same page reduces the odds of mistaking obsolete information for current. Distance no longer keeps workers apart. As we remove obstacles, the time required to do anything shrivels up.

 

Why bother? 

Collaboration that does not increase revenue, improve relationships with customers, cut costs, grow employees, expand innovation, communicate values, streamline the work process, or help execute strategy should not be funded.

 

Companies are using social software to

  • speed the flow of information through the organization
  • improve customer service
  • streamline workflow and slash bureaucracy
  • unleash the power of collective intelligence
  • create nerve centers for corporate news and market intelligence
  • make all corporate know-how accessible 24/7
  • recruit the best candidates for new positions and make them productive quickly
  • replace training classes with informal, hands-on learning
  • open the process of innovation to all employees
  • help workers build strong, supportive relationships
  • enable managers to assess the status and direction of projects
  • empower all employees to contribute ideas and feel part of the team
  • develop more productive relationships with customers, prospects, recruits, partners, supply chain, and other employees.

Compared to old-style groupware such as Lotus Notes, today’s social software is simple, unstructured, emergent, inherently transparent, and scalable.

 

Kick off

It is never easy to change the way people relate to one another at work. People and corporate cultures have different views on being open, taking risks, trying new things, realigning responsibilities, learning new technologies, and trusting one another. What works in one organization may fail in the next.

 

The safe approach to online collaboration is to begin with small-scale experiments, score some successes, and replicate them in other areas of the company. As the technology takes hold, policies are drawn to enforce common standards and safe behavior.

 

Your mileage may vary, but most managers agree that initial projects have a better chance of thriving if if the following pieces are in place:

 

·         Participants have a shared need.

·         It’s easy for participants to see what’s in it for them.

·         The information involved is not controversial.

·         A sound business case can be made.

·         Stand-alone implementation is feasible; for example, not requiring connection with other systems.

·         The project yields a good example to use when getting support for other projects.

·        You can open in New Haven.

 

New Haven? Well, metaphorically: Sixty years ago, producers staged new plays at the Shubert Theater in New Haven, Connecticut, before taking them to Broadway. No critics were in the audience, so if a major overhaul was required before the official release, no one was the wiser. Similarly, if your first prototype bombs, it’s nice to be able to sweep it under the carpet and begin anew.

 

Document the business case

To maintain focus, the owner of a project should prepare a document in response to these questions: 

  • What is the goal of the collaboration?
  • What’s the current situation?
  • What do expect it to be after the project?
  • How will this be accomplished?
  • What is the business benefit? (In business terms.)
  • Who’s going to take part?
  • What might go wrong?
  • Is this a one-time project or an on-going process?
  • Do we have sponsorship high up?
  • Who will participate on the team?
  • If it’s a one-timer, when will it be completed? What is the kill date?
  • Who is the project champion?

Display your answers prominently on the wiki, blog, or whatever tool is involved. Collaboration demands transparency.

 

New recruits are refusing to work with organizations that don’t permit them to post a personal profile, use instant messenger, and connect to friends when they encounter a question. Assign them to collaborative teams. Elliott Masie tells of his disappointment with a new hire who had the continual distraction of six friends always a click away on her desktop. How could she concentrate? Then he realized that instead of having one new person working for The Masie Center, he had seven!

 

Gain team member commitment

It’s great to begin a long-term collaboration with a face-to-face meeting. Either in person or virtual, social bonding comes before business, for that’s the platform on which the work will be built. Begin with games and getting-to-know-you exercises. Give people time to talk and become familiar with one another.

 

Social connections remain vital throughout the collaboration. People work best with people they know. Encourage people to share information about themselves. Post photographs of participants. Pinpoint their locations on a map.

 

It’s important that collaborators work under the same set of assumptions. Discuss each of these areas and ask for individual commitment to them.

  • Respect the team, and do what is best to accomplish the objective. Be selfless, not selfish.
  • Members will be active. If a member spots something to improve the collaboration, she volunteers to do it.
  • Members freely share ideas and suggestions. They do not hoard information or keep secrets.
  • Members treat each other with respect. The team is committed to continuous improvement.
  • Members care for one another emotionally, helping one another over rough spots and fears.
  • Use whatever tools are appropriate to advance the project: phone calls, on-line meetings.
  • Members trust one another. They “make this marriage work.”  

Be prepared for push-back. Workers who see collaboration as hindering their work rather than supporting it will be reluctant to join the effort. Organizations that are accustomed to a single viewpoint (usually top management’s) can become rattled as other voices begin to speak. It’s useful to recruit a band of early supporters to help sell the value of the project.

 

The nature of networks

Metcalf’s Law posits that value of a network grows exponentially with the addition of connections. Left unfettered, network nodes reproduce like rabbits on espresso. Think, for example, of the hyper growth of the internet, the web, MySpace, YouTube, and FaceBook. Once business  networks take hold, expect them to grow like topsy, too. Moreover, the denser a network, the faster its cycle time. More connections make it quicker to get from one node to another.

Here’s how this can happen in an organization. The first nodes appear as the company experiments with a few small projects such as coordinating online project groups or making it easier to find information with a “Wikipedia inside.” New hires are accustomed to going wherever they wish in a network; imagine that they begin communicating between silos. HR realizes that the company-pedia can accelerate onboarding new employees. Customer service improves as everyone gains access to corporate resources such as who does what and how to find them. Replacing multiple versions with a single source of information cuts bureaucracy and chops email volume back. The growth of corporate connections feeds on itself.

Maintain Momentum

As the organization’s use of collaborative software crosses the chasm from specialty item to important business process, focus shifts to keeping collaboration vibrant, disseminating lessons learned, and informally benchmarking performance. Companies that have successfully made the transition suggest these practices for maintaining momentum after initial enthusiasm wears thin:

  • Dismantle roadblocks to collaboration.
  • Make the goal and ground rules clear at the outset.
  • Structure the initial framework to fit the task.
  • Make the online environment attracting and inviting.
  • Pre-load templates, background info, and defaults.
  • Provide emotional support for newcomers.
  • Delegate responsibility for keeping the ball rolling to the team.
  • Rely on self-regulation.
  • Don’t micromanage.
  • Market the service: publicity, seed with enthusiasts, and contests.
  • Use incentives to get things ramped up.
  • Report results at least quarterly.
  • Conclude project teams with written evaluation.
  • Ask for participants to suggest “How we can make this better.”
  • Don’t skimp on investment. This is all cheap compared to the alternative.
  • Use bots to send periodic reminders about what’s going on.
  • Encourage (or enforce!) tagging, making things searchable and thus easier to use.

Now what?

 

Even though this article has covered suggestions from multiple practitioners, it has only scratched the surface of the people side of making Web 2.0 work.

 

There’s more information on the InternetTime wiki, at http://internettime.pbwiki.com/collaboration (or http://tinyurl.com/yraoah), including an outline for phased introductions, more links, and descriptions of a dozen implementations. So many people are discovering the rules of thumb on the people aspects of profiting from the web, it would be a pity not to share them.

 

In the spirit of collaboration, please add your hints, stories, and suggestions to the starter-article at http://internettime.pbwiki.com/collaboration. If editing a wiki page is not your cup of tea, push the Comments button at the top the page to leave a free-form note.

 

Let’s shoot for continuous improvement. (Pass the word.) I’ll return to Learning Circuits in three months to report on what you’ve turned up. 


If you don’t know a social network from the blogosphere, check out Common Craft’s delightful series of short video explanations. Have Google search for plain English video.


Jay Cross is founder of Internet Time Group, which has provided advice and guidance to Cisco, IBM, Sun, Genentech, Merck, Novartis, HP, the CIA, and the World Bank. He also is the author of He is the author of Informal Learning, co-author of  Implementing eLearning, and contributor to The Blended Learning Handbook. Contact him at http://jaycross.com.


Research for this article was funded in part by Learning Light, a centre of excellence in the use of learning technologies in the workplace and organisational learning best practice; www.learninglight.com.

 

 
 
Request more information or report issues with this page.
To add pages to your ASTD Favorites you must be logged in.